No one said being in government would be easy -- but do we have to make it so difficult for ourselves?
The package for tuition fees outlined today is undeniably more progressive than what was in place before. It will, if enacted, ensure that many graduates are lifted out of the need to pay completely. And, let's face it, a finite payment as provided by tuition fees is less noxious than a life-long charge for having gone to university that is a graduate tax. But all those good points -- or not-so-bad points -- are as nothing beside two unavoidable realities.
First: tuition fees, like graduate taxes, are wrong in principle. They penalise those who have gone to university on the false assumption that only the individual educated gains from that experience. It is in society's interest to see a proportion of its young through a liberal education -- at times it might not feel like it, but we all gain from having doctors, lawyers and, yes, broadsheet journalists. Education is not a private good; it should not be paid for as if it were a contract between student and 'provider'.
But, even if that were not the principle, none of us could get away from the fact that our party made a pledge to fight against tuition fees that we said were unfair. We were right then and it remains right. Of course, political parties go back on their promises -- look at the number of lies that came from New Labour. But, if we want to reform politics, we have to live the reform we espouse. Even if it were wrong, we'd need to stand by our pledge.
What now? First of all, we need to recognise that the Browne Review, designed by Labour to give the result it did, is not the only answer to the conundrum. There are larger issues here: what percentage of our young should go to university? What alternative educations are there?
The most depressing aspect of this is that the coalition government has failed to reject Labour's assumptions that were: higher education is a soft target for disinvestment, and that the only education that matters is that which is vocational -- in New Labour-speak, 'strategically important'. That language has continued in Lord Browne's Review, and it's that which needs to be attacked. It's time that Liberals stood up for the value of a liberal education.
5 comments:
Everybody makes mistakes, but more importantly, everybody has the opportunity to learn from their mistakes.
When the coalition agreement was published, Lib Dems nationally were amazed at the number of concessions the Party negotiators had won. But the agreed abstention from voting on likely increases in student tuition fees was there for all to see.
Timing is acutely sensitive in politics.
I wonder if reputational damage could have been reduced if, at that point, the Lib Dem leadership had come out from the very beginning and said:
"We could not get what we wanted on the tuition fees issue and this is a terrible blow for us as this contravenes our long-held beliefs and commitments to our voters, but we pledge to the public that as soon as we are in majority power we shall overturn any legislation made in this parliament that fundamentally contravenes our national policy"?
That at least would be a stronger, more understandable message. It may not make things right, but at least it gives clarity of position.
Bonjour,
je suis nouveau ici j'aime vous lire ;)
je voulais vous remercier pour votre super site internet !
Bonne continuation
----
Nicolaseo, Rien de mieux que le referencement naturel.
You got good points there, that's why I always love your site, it seems that you are an expert in this field. keep up the fantastic work, My friend recommends your site.
My blog:
rachat credit immobilier meilleur taux www.rachatdecredit.net
I am very happy to read this article..thanks for giving us this useful information.
buy propecia online order propecia online no prescription - buy propecia generic finasteride
Post a Comment